[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions



time to sleep :)
lets continue in IMP meeting

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Daniel Russel <> wrote:
>
> On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Javier Ángel Velázquez Muriel wrote:
>
>
> 2009/10/8 Daniel Russel <>
>>
>> On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:26 PM, Dina Schneidman wrote:
>>
>>> yes! another good point, changes affect others! especially when the
>>> logic is changed...
>>>
>> Definitely. Although in this case there was no previously specified
>> logic...
>
> I disagree. The point was raised many times and never discussed.
>
> That is what I mean: while it came up, we never specified a solution (and
> never implemented one). The docs for the read pdb function only talked about
> the lower parts of the hierarchy and left the details we are currently
> discussing unspecified.
> _______________________________________________
> IMP-dev mailing list
> 
> https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev
>
>