Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions

To: List for IMP development <>
Subject: Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions
From: Daniel Russel <>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 21:45:55 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=La4du8QF9q7ufm3cS35qwp7J2WMh1mS7UHyh9jYLcE+oXGUAFB2ux3c4dlCCRzBeu3 B9tod6/zNsvtvRSzidgj3y4I9TotQsBn0yn5v9llbn6afxH8DUSjEFI4T4emuqLioSRT mJO/IaZQ9bNnLcuA/NPeOufiFHrptaCIkEGvc=
Reply-to: List for IMP development <>


On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:26 PM, Dina Schneidman wrote:

yes! another good point, changes affect others! especially when the
logic is changed...

Definitely. Although in this case there was no previously specifiedlogic...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions
  - From: Javier Ángel Velázquez Muriel <>

References:
- [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
  - From: Daniel Russel <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
  - From: Keren Lasker <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
  - From: Keren Lasker <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
  - From: Daniel Russel <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
  - From: Keren Lasker <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
  - From: Dina Schneidman <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
  - From: Keren Lasker <>
- [IMP-dev] design discussions
  - From: Keren Lasker <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions
  - From: Javier Ángel Velázquez Muriel <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions
  - From: Dina Schneidman <>