[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions

To: List for IMP development <>
Subject: Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions
From: Javier Ángel Velázquez Muriel <>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 21:48:04 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=kzdhqTGgNBRmggfM3YcBvNVFU7WrJ7TjFeRdkLKcanbHChYbImNikm616gskT77aKp 7OYcBucGOhMfEoLeb/GxNGsiZiahE5l93PrMQ2L63F4nj4z6FL4lk59fHakPW7KL7y/Q R0uP38XqQV/N5PCL5O8duXtIKTokr9DvaupkY=
Reply-to: List for IMP development <>

2009/10/8 Daniel Russel <">>

On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:26 PM, Dina Schneidman wrote:

yes! another good point, changes affect others! especially when the
logic is changed...

Definitely. Although in this case there was no previously specified logic...

I disagree. The point was raised many times and never discussed.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions
  - From: Daniel Russel <>

References:
- [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
  - From: Daniel Russel <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
  - From: Daniel Russel <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
  - From: Keren Lasker <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
  - From: Dina Schneidman <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
  - From: Keren Lasker <>
- [IMP-dev] design discussions
  - From: Keren Lasker <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions
  - From: Javier Ángel Velázquez Muriel <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions
  - From: Dina Schneidman <>
- Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions
  - From: Daniel Russel <>

Prev by Date: Re: [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
Next by Date: Re: [IMP-dev] Multichain proteins
Previous by thread: Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions
Next by thread: Re: [IMP-dev] design discussions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread