Re: [IMP-users] Sigmoidal crosslinks in IMP.pmi 2.7.0
To: Help and discussion for users of IMP <>
Subject: Re: [IMP-users] Sigmoidal crosslinks in IMP.pmi 2.7.0
From: Isabelle Phan <>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:52:14 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
I would also like to know why the sigmoid scoring function was deprecated.
thanks,
Isabelle
On Jun 29, 2017, at 2:34 AM, Riccardo Pellarin <<">mailto:>> wrote:
IMP.pmi.restraints.crosslinking.CrossLinkingMassSpectrometryRestraint()
is indeed a sigmoidal function modulated by two parameters sigma (inflection) and psi (baselines).
The maximal length of the crosslinker is passed through "length=..." in the constructor.
There is a linear part, but that is just a soft bias to avoid particles getting dispersed, since the potential is flat
at high distance values. The slope of the linear part is 0.01-0.02 Score Unit/ Angstrom, can be changed using "slope=..."
Riccardo Pellarin, PhD
===================
Institut Pasteur
CNRS UMR 3528
25, rue du Docteur Roux
75724 Paris Cedex 15, France
<">mailto:>
+33 (0)1 44 38 93 63
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Fergal Duffy <<">mailto:>> wrote:
I am using IMP.pmi to model a protein complex using MS crosslinks. I notice that the IMP.pmi crosslinking function, IMP.pmi.restraints.crosslinking.CrossLinkingMassSpectrometryRestraint(), scores crosslinks basically as a linear function of crosslink distance. The crosslink length is basically irrelevant here, shorter=better.
Ideally, I would like to score crosslinks as a sigmoid function, with crosslinks inside the specified ‘length’ dropping in score. I notice that there is a deprecated SigmoidCrossLinkMS() function in IMP, which uses an IMP.pmi.SigmoidRestraintSphere to model the crosslinks. Is there a reason this is deprecated? Should I be using it? It seems to offer functionality not available elsewhere.
Regards,
Fergal
Fergal Duffy
Postdoctoral Researcher
Center for Infectious Disease Research<http://www.cidresearch.org/>
307 Westlake Ave N, Suite 500 | Seattle, WA 98109
206.256.7435<tel:%28206%29%20256-7435> | <">mailto:>
_______________________________________________
IMP-users mailing list
<">mailto:>
https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-users
_______________________________________________
IMP-users mailing list
<">mailto:>
https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-users