Subject: Re: [IMP-dev] Shall we declare it a release?
From: Daniel Russel <>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:18:58 -0700
Reply-to: List for IMP development <>
On Apr 19, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Ben Webb <> wrote:
> On 4/19/13 10:29 AM, Daniel Russel wrote:
>> The only issue that is in the release milestone relates to the web pages.
>
> I would prefer to let the nightly build run first to make sure no horrible problems have cropped up, then update master from that revision. Otherwise it would seem that the release hasn't even been tested to compile everywhere, which is less testing than the nightly builds themselves.
Sure. I practice, I think that and what I am suggesting are identical (in that we will continue to patch the release and there will be plenty of lag between declaring a version the release and getting everything ready for people to take).