Everything that you guys think is OK, I am on board with, including
renaming domino as indicated in other emails.
I very strongly agree with Keren about tutorials and examples. I think
that the new Sali Lab members and visitors should be closely consulted
on these, since they're in the process of learning everything and we
can see if what's there makes sense. Maybe we can have a roundtable next
week. Sadly, I might be getting to the point where IMP is intuitive and
therefore can't say if it makes sense from a newbie perspective.
Dave
On 11/5/10 12:17 PM, Keren Lasker wrote:
Hi -
1. em: Completely on board with using algebra::Grid3D as a base. Will
simplify many things. Lets talk about it offline.
2. I think a *very* important feature for 1.1 is many many examples/
tutorials and applications (systems). It may very well be the show
stopper for the release :)
We should decide on the systems for the 1.1, that are also
aligned with the IMP paper.
Keren.
On Nov 5, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Daniel Russel wrote:
Given that it has been a while since IMP 1.0 was released and IMP
has improved a lot, I think we should have an IMP 1.1 release in the
near future (say, on the order of a month). There are a few modules
with fairly active development, which can either stabilized for a
release or skipped from the release. The status of each modules as I
understand it (ok means "no implementation plans/known important
bugs"):
- build system: ok
- kernel: ok
- cgal: volume/surface are computations are not heavily tested, but
they are not a show stopper
- algebra: ok
- bullet: ok
- display: ok
- em2d: active development, Javi, what are your plans/goals?
- modeller: ok
- restrainer: ok
- domino: should probably go away for the release
- example: ok
- multifit: active development. Keren, what are your plans/goals?
- saxs: ok
- atom: ok (recent development in the protein-ligand score, more
bugs might be discovered there)
- container: ok
- domino2: ok (poor handling of nbls with rigid bodies, but I don't
think it is a show stopper)
- gsl: ok
- statistics: ok
- benchmark: ok
- core: ok
- em: discussed plans for moving to algebra::Grid3D and moving
algorithms to algebra where they can be more widely used, but no
implementation. This would be nice, and should be relatively quick,
but not a show stopper, I think.
- misc: ok
- openmm: should not be part of release
I'll make a pass through before the release to add more comments to
example code (others feel free to contribute, please, please
please :-)
Other issues?
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
IMP-dev mailing list
https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev