Daniel Russel wrote:
> Should we establish an explicit rule in IMP that all distances are in
> angstroms? The range of scales is small enough that we don't have
> accuracy issues for doing this. In addition, we then don't have to worry
> about some things being in nanometers (since we have no way of tagging
> things with units).
>
> Ben already established a convention of having units if kCal/MolAngstrom
> for derivative quantities. So angstroms fits with that.
I see no reason to force people to use any particular unit, if they