Re: [IMP-dev] Minor breaking change and a proposal for some other changes
To: List for IMP development <>
Subject: Re: [IMP-dev] Minor breaking change and a proposal for some other changes
From: Ben Webb <>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:58:35 -0700
Reply-to: List for IMP development <>
Daniel Russel wrote:
>> Well, that is true, but it seems reasonable to allow multiple
>> inheritance in decorators - or at least, it seems unreasonable to
>> preclude it.
> The problem is just a practical one: either we use virtual inheritence
> or we have two particle pointers. Neither is very
Oh, of course - we have diamond inheritance. Ick, I agree.
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle