Re: [IMP-dev] get_interacting_particles

[Keren Lasker <>]

I am using the latest version, updated an hour ago.
The code is:
Particles r_particles;
  for(ParticlesList::iterator it1 =  
r.get_interacting_particles().begin();
      it1 != r.get_interacting_particles().end(); it1++){
    std::cout<<it1->size()<<std::endl;
    for(Particles::iterator it2 = it1->begin(); it2 != it1->end();  
it2++) {
      r_particles.push_back(*it2);
     }
  }


The size I get from the first one is: 17507811567898
The restraint is of type
connectivity restraint (active):

I solved it by using:
Particles r_particles;
ParticlesList pl;
  for(ParticlesList::iterator it1 = pl.begin();
      it1 != pl.end(); it1++){
    std::cout<<it1->size()<<std::endl;
    for(Particles::iterator it2 = it1->begin(); it2 != it1->end();  
it2++) {
      r_particles.push_back(*it2);
     }
  }


but I think that the first version should work as well - no ??

On Aug 21, 2008, at 12:54 AM, Ben Webb wrote:

> Keren Lasker wrote:
> > ok - so I am using the latest IMP version, which broke my c++ code as
> > now I should use get_interacting_particles., which is fine.
> > The problem is that it is not working for ConnectivityRestraint  
> > from c+
> > +.
> > The first Particles I get in the ParticlesList is garbage.
>
> What sort of garbage? Invalid pointers, or something else? Can you  
> post
> your code?
>
> > does it suppose to work on or at this point ?
>
> Sure, it's supposed to work - at least in the revision at
> https://salilab.org/internal/imp/tests.html
> since that's from the nightly build, and all the tests passed. There  
> are
> unit tests for this method. What you should be getting for
> ConnectivityRestraint is the default implementation from Restraint,
> which is a 1-element ParticlesList containing a Particles vector with
> all Particles in the restraint.
>
> 	Ben
> --
>                       http://salilab.org/~ben/
> "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
> 	- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
> _______________________________________________
> IMP-dev mailing list
>
> https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev