> I don't agree. There is no way that we can do sufficient testing of the > code itself, packaging, documentation etc. etc. to warrant making this > our primary distribution channel. It currently is our primary distribution channel currently
Right, and that isn't a long term solution. An untested, always sort-of-broken nightly build cheapens the whole product. People expect to see well tested stable builds from time to time.
I suspect that if we are going to make releases work we need to have them every 6 months or so
Yes, that's what we already committed ourselves to.
Ben
--
http://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle