Date Prev ][Date Next ][Thread Prev ][Thread Next ][Date Index ][Thread Index ]
[IMP-dev] Restraint::{get,set}_is_active
To : List for IMP development <imp-dev@salilab.org imp-devATsalilab.org >Subject : [IMP-dev] Restraint::{get,set}_is_activeFrom : Daniel Russel <drussel@gmail.com drusselATgmail.com >Date : Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:38:43 -0700Domainkey-signature : a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=TC3kma362+M1KybngvoWCx/Lnw1lY9+AClru24OzoxZLWgM1g2uHgwCFFN4bs/+32z +mMWSee9pqPi6mgHQ5Yz1Ym2DW081ZEg0puQqocemEdGtouykwcnngWIy+uPZBHggfQT KvUJzlp79pnIt0GzXHrSBPMybcqZL1vavkCLk=Reply-to : List for IMP development <imp-dev@salilab.org imp-devATsalilab.org >
Does anyone use these functions? One could do the same thing with
RestraintSets. I think they are left over from the vague plans for
handling inactive particles.
If no one uses them I'll remove them.