I thought it was already established :)
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Daniel Russel <> wrote:
> Should we establish an explicit rule in IMP that all distances are in
> angstroms? The range of scales is small enough that we don't have accuracy
> issues for doing this. In addition, we then don't have to worry about some
> things being in nanometers (since we have no way of tagging things with
> units).
>
> Ben already established a convention of having units if kCal/MolAngstrom for
> derivative quantities. So angstroms fits with that.
>
> _______________________________________________
> IMP-dev mailing list
>
> https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev
>
>