Daniel Russel wrote:
> Since every call of p=IMP.Particle() is immediately followed by
> m.add_particle(p) (and at this point there is no way to make it so that
> a particle could be in multiple models) I'd suggest that we add a
> constructor of Particle that takes a model allowing everyone to save a
> line here and there.
Sounds reasonable to me.
Ben
--
http://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle