Re: [IMP-dev] 2D geometry

[Daniel Russel <>]

Or vector and matrix can be replaced by a single version templated on  
the dimension. We definitely don't want separate code bases for the 2  
and 3D versions as it will be a pain to keep the set of operations in  
sync.

On Nov 12, 2008, at 10:50 PM, Keren Lasker wrote:

> Javi,
>
> For your 2D geometry classes (Vector2D, Matrix2D ...) - why not just
> using the corresponding 3D classes and keeping Z fixed?
> I think it is not too bad in performance and will save you a lot of
> coding/debugging time.
>
> Keren.
> _______________________________________________
> IMP-dev mailing list
>
> https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev