[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
[IMP-dev] 2D geometry
To
: Javier Ángel Velázquez Muriel <
javiATsalilab.org
>
Subject
: [IMP-dev] 2D geometry
From
: Keren Lasker <
kerenlATsalilab.org
>
Date
: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:50:20 -0500
Cc
: List for IMP development <
imp-devATsalilab.org
>,
embed-devATsalilab.org
Reply-to
: List for IMP development <
imp-devATsalilab.org
>
Javi,
For your 2D geometry classes (Vector2D, Matrix2D ...) - why not just
using the corresponding 3D classes and keeping Z fixed?
I think it is not too bad in performance and will save you a lot of
coding/debugging time.
Keren.
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [IMP-dev] 2D geometry
From:
Daniel Russel <
drusselATgmail.com
>
Re: [IMP-dev] 2D geometry
From:
"Javier Ángel Velázquez Muriel" <
javiATsalilab.org
>
Prev by Date:
Re: [IMP-dev] [IMP-commits] r854 - trunk/modules/misc/include
Next by Date:
Re: [IMP-dev] 2D geometry
Previous by thread:
Re: [IMP-dev] [IMP-commits] r854 - trunk/modules/misc/include
Next by thread:
Re: [IMP-dev] 2D geometry
Index(es):
Date
Thread