On Apr 26, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Ben Webb wrote:
Typo. I meant "O(N) or not is irrelevant" as the constants are what really matters. But yes, as I mentioned before, supporting different sized particles makes it not O(N) as there is a term to handle the spread in radii.Daniel Russel wrote:O(N) is not is irrelevant. The constants are what matters and theywere bad. The code I submitted is better, but still not as fast as theCGAL one.I must be misunderstanding your benchmark, in that case.
Yes and anything can be linked against QPL, from my understanding, so I don't see the problem. What am I missing?Nope, the other way around: anything can be linked to LGPL. We still have to respect the licenses of our dependencies. LGPL is what Iproposed for IMP, but Andrej has not yet made a decision on this score.I proposed LGPL so that others could write their own extension modules and not be forced to make them open source.