Re: [IMP-dev] pdb patch

[Keren Lasker <>]

> 2. The atom type could be argued to really be 'name', since, for
> example, AT_CG1 and AT_CG2 are both carbon, and this is orthogonal  
> from
> the CHARMM forcefield type (probably CT2 or CT3).
In modeller this data is stored as name, I guess that you know better  
the reasons for that -  so the conversion is:
 ap.set_type(IMP.AtomType(a.name))
We should just use what ever is the convention - which I thought was  
name, but if not than we can leave it as it is.