Re: [IMP-dev] minor quibble

[Ben Webb <ben@salilab.org>]

Daniel Russel wrote:
> It probably better to call it UnaryFunction rather than UnaryFunctor as 
> unary functors already mean something more general in C++ (any functor 
> that takes one variable). I guess strictly speaking it should be 
> UnaryRealFunction, but we can get elide the Real.
Fair enough; as of r319 they are UnaryFunctions.

	Ben
--
ben@salilab.org                      http://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
	- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle