Re: [IMP-dev] First significant code review

[Ben Webb <>]

Daniel Russel wrote:
> DistanceRestraint now takes a pair of ParticleIndexes and a ScoreFunc 
> which it then owns.

On this subject, did you make any more progress with the reference 
counting code? It seems like this would be a obvious candidate for 
reference counting (e.g. an excluded volume may create thousands of 
distance restraints, all of which share a single scoring function by 
increasing its reference count). I seem to recall that you were stuck at 
the Python interface. If this is still the case, I can take a look, as I 
(probably) know a bit about the SWIG internals.

If others think reference counting of IMP objects is a bad idea, now's 
the time to say...

	Ben
--
                      http://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
	- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle