Re: directory structure

[Daniel Russel <drussel@salilab.org>]

> How does this differ from what we talked about last week? If it's  
> the same, then the same deal applies: I'm waiting on the scons guys  
> to resolve some build issues before making any big changes.
Nope, same thing. I figured the rearrangement meant stuff had been  
resolved and something had just gotten lost along the way :-)
> P.S. What is this mystery project which needs to include the IMP  
> headers? In my opinion, it'd be great to have at least some version  
> of this in the IMP SVN repository with Keren's impEM stuff, because  
> it's really the applications which define what we do (and need to  
> do) with IMP.
When I am trying things out, I don't want to put things into the IMP  
svn, change the scons setup and whatever other things are necessary  
to use the existing build system. I think the best thing to do is to  
make another project and then include/link against imp. Eventually I  
hope other people will want to do the same :-)