[IMP-dev] Re: build error related to C++11 flag on Mac + conda
To:
Subject: [IMP-dev] Re: build error related to C++11 flag on Mac + conda
From: Ben Webb <>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 11:54:59 -0800
On 12/19/22 11:35 AM, Barak Raveh wrote:
> At least on my Mac installation, conda's gcc package seems to be
> broken.
Are you sure you have the latest versions of everything? IMP built just
fine on Mac with conda-forge just 4 days ago, e.g.
https://dev.azure.com/conda-forge/84710dde-1620-425b-80d0-4cf5baca359d/_apis/build/builds/629436/logs/83
> a conflict between conda's boost::mt19337::min()/max() functions and
> llvm's std::shuffle(), which requires them to return a constexpr (this
> was fixed in the latest boost versions)
Yes, we had the same issue with Ubuntu, which has an older Boost:
https://github.com/salilab/imp/commit/f1b873faeee
But this issue was fixed in Boost 1.75 and if you're using conda-forge
you should have 1.78 as the IMP conda-forge package is pinned:
https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-pinning-feedstock/blob/main/recipe/conda_build_config.yaml
> I tested for speed, and std::mt19337 is as fast or even faster on my
> mac. This is the change, l did not dare to check it in. Let me know if
> you think we should stick with the boost version or try to add this
> change
Looks like your proposed change only affects clang builds. If we're
going to switch to std::mt19337 we should just do so on all platforms,
since IMP requires C++11 anyway. If there are some weird platforms where
it doesn't work, we can always #ifdef it there and fall back to Boost.
Ben
--
https://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle