just because it in not necessarily the exact molecular mass, and it
you use it you need to handle two decorators one for XYZR and one for
mass, it is easier to have a joint decorator - no ?
On Jan 23, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Daniel Russel wrote:
Why doesn't it make sense to use mass with beads? Its is what I have
been doing.
On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:14 PM, Keren Lasker wrote:
hi,
Currently we have a generic XYZR decorator.
For mass we have atom::Mass, but when dealing with beads, it does
not really make sense to use it.
Do you think it makes sense to create a generic XYZRW decorator in
core ? the default W key can be atom::Mass::get_mass_key()