On Oct 9, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Ben Webb wrote:
Agreed, anything shorter to suggest that gets the point across? Not that short would prevent me from misspelling it.On 10/09/2009 03:58 PM, Daniel Russel wrote:To address this, I propose: - provide IMP_implementation_check and IMP_usage_check macros- provide a methods to turn on and off the two different types of checksindependently - remove the concept of check levelsSounds reasonable to me. The only problem I have with it is that IMP_implementation_check is kind of long to type, and easy to misspell (as you in fact have already demonstrated later in your email!)
"internal" probably would do.