Re: [IMP-dev] get_interacting_particles

[Daniel Russel <drussel@gmail.com>]

On Sep 7, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Keren Lasker wrote:

> not completely sure i got this comment .... - you mean that  
> ScoreState should have get_interacting_particles function ?
Yes. And that it is needed to get the full interaction graph.

> that makes sense for many analysis procedures.
> On Sep 6, 2009, at 11:58 PM, Daniel Russel wrote:
>
> > Which reminds me: many of the interactions are via score states, so  
> > we might need an equivalent for them.
> >
> >
> > On Sep 6, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Keren Lasker <kerenl@salilab.org> wrote:
> >
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > quick question:
> > >
> > > Given two proteins, represented as  rigid bodies.
> > > Constructing a PairsRestraint on the two rigid bodies, what should  
> > > be the result on the get_interacting_particles() ?
> > > for some reason I am getting 0, also after evaluating the restraint.
> > > I would have expected to get one list with two entries ( the two  
> > > rigid bodies).
> > > what am i doing wrong ?
> > >
> > > thank you,
> > > Keren.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IMP-dev mailing list
> > > IMP-dev@salilab.org
> > > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > IMP-dev mailing list
> > IMP-dev@salilab.org
> > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev
> _______________________________________________
> IMP-dev mailing list
> IMP-dev@salilab.org
> https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev