Daniel Russel wrote:
> I think we need to put some thought towards what ways of using IMP we
> want to support. As I see it, there are two usage models to support:
> 1) The user installs IMP in some standard location and uses it like any
> other library.
...
> 2) The user adds a module to IMP (but does not check it in to IMP svn)
> and uses the IMP build system and imppy.sh to run things.
(1) is pretty much the standard way "normal" packages work, so I think
should be the only one we support. We could possibly provide a simple
set of SConscripts for those wanting to link programs or other modules
against IMP.
> I think Keren uses IMP by calling imppy.sh from an external project. I
> would like to discourage this model
I agree.
Ben
--
http://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle