[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IMP-dev] [IMP-commits] r770 - trunk/doc

Daniel Russel wrote:
> Looks good except I think that sending paches to impdev is not a great  
> way to raise changes for discussion. An English description and  
> proposed function signatures (if non trivial functions are propsed) is  
> probably more useful ((and both patches and English is a bit much)

Exactly - that's what I say, isn't it? Maybe the text is misleading in
some way? I just say "discuss these interfaces on the imp-dev mailing
list" not the implementations. Or perhaps you're referring to a
different part of the text?

"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
	- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle