Daniel Russel wrote:
> I think I am still confused, is the experimental for any restraints
> that deal with experimental data or for experimental restraints (i.e.
> ones whose functionality is not yet completely nailed down)? If it is
> the former, I misunderstood, but it should definitely have its tests
> run. If the latter, it seems quite reasonably to run tests on it, but
> not have the tests break the build. And it also seems reasonable to
> put things there first and then move them elsewhere when they are
> better defined and more stable.
It's the latter.
Ben
--
ben@salilab.orghttp://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle