Daniel Russel wrote:
> Given the shift to modules, it is not clear that the original include
> directory structure is the best any more (with IMP/restraints holding
> restraints, for example). I would propose that all public classes/
> functions in the modules API be in headers in the module main include
> directory.
Sure, why not? It doesn't really make a whole lot of difference either
way - the only reason to have a non-flat directory structure is to make
things easier to look at with 'ls' (the structure has no influence on
the way modules are linked).
Ben
--
http://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle